home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: linux.nildram.co.uk!usenet
- From: roger@burgess.nildram.co.uk (Roger SS Burgess)
- Newsgroups: uk.comp.misc,uk.net,comp.dcom.modems
- Subject: Re: Sportster Vi 28,800 modem - any good ?
- Date: Sat, 16 Mar 1996 22:09:48 GMT
- Organization: Nildram On-Line
- Message-ID: <4ifedt$hi0@linux.nildram.co.uk>
- References: <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk> <4hqstk$h0d@newsgate.dircon.co.uk>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: pppl.nildram.co.uk
- X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82
-
- loughnan@dircon.co.uk (John Loughnan) wrote:
-
- >In article <31372FE6.4E3B@vax.sbu.ac.uk>, leelaslk@vax.sbu.ac.uk says...
- >>
- >>Does anyone have any good or bad experiences with the US Robotics
- >>Sportster Vi 28,800 modem ?.
- >>
- >>Thanks for any info.
- >>
- >>Lasitha
- >>--
- >>Lasitha Leelasena
- >>Systems & Software Engineer
- >>South Bank University, London
- >>E-mail:Lasitha.Leelasena@sbu.ac.uk
- >I do not know if it counts but I have been
- >using this modem for a couple of weeks now
- >and have had no problems with it.
- >I think it is very good.
-
- >John
- Hi
- Unfortunatly I purchased 1 of these bits of junk to use with my
- notebook while mobile. I wanted to use the software I use in the
- office. Trumpet Winsock Bitcom & Bitfax. Bitcom and Trumpet works fine
- but I use the fax more and Bitfax will not work nor will any other
- fax software other than the supplied interlink crap. I am fed up
- trying to get Robotics to admiit they have a problem. The last straw
- was when 1 of their engineeers told me that the Sportser V34 was type
- 2.0 compliant but not 2 compliant same applied to type 1.0 and 1.
- If you just want to access the net its fine but if you need to fax
- forget it
- Bye
-
-
- Roger Burgess Tel. +44 (0)1243 785325
- Fax +44 (0)1243 771061
- Mobile +44 (0)383 950320
- e-mail roger@burgess.nildram.co.uk
-
-